I have listened and commented from time to time on this fascinating COFDM versus 8 VSB debate and so it is apparent to me that there is a lot of deep feeling about the issue, the evidence being there still IS a debate after all this time (I've been reading this list for at least 5 years and I'm not involved in broadcasting). If, as you say Bob, "the reality in the US is virtually no one is even interested in OTA. Retailers, consumers and broadcasters are all showing little to no interest in OTA." then what is the point of this discussion? Who IS interested? Aren't the broadcasters happy to piggyback off the cable companies?. Are the consumers unhappy? If the debate is concentrated to the purely technical it is quite clear the issue has been well and truely decided and not in favour of ATSC. That leaves all the political and commercial influence coupled with the inability of the general public to know, let alone comment on, what is good for them. So the public gets a system that may not be on further consideration the best technical choice. Those who do not agree with this point argue against the technical and commercial opinion of practically all of the rest of the world's countries. Of course this is all regrettable from the view of informed consumers in many countries because had the USA embraced a very attractive technology from a global perspective, it would have benefited us all in economies of scale, the USA included. It is interesting to speculate if this debate will still be rageing in another 5 years time. Barry Wilkins On 11/16/06, Bob Miller <robmxa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is not just that we don't have many STBs for sale here. You can say that most people want an integrated set. No In many other countries OTA is very much alive and GROWING. Bob Miller On 11/15/06, John Shutt <shuttj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:17 PM > Subject: [opendtv] Re: Freeview realities > > > > John Shutt wrote: > > > >> Choice of modulation is what allows Australia, a country of > >> 20 million people, to have "80 models of STBs for sale" while > >> we have almost none in ATSC. > > > > The funny thing is, in spite of all the evidence of global decoder > > chipsets, global tuners, and easily integrated 8-VSB demods, is that you > > and Bob continue to believe that the reason for this is the modulation > > standard. > > > > How about, just for example, if the difference were that in Australia, > > the retailers are willing to market these boxes, while in the US, the > > retailers are encouraged to hide them? That's just a conspiracy theory > > example, but it illustrates that JUST MAYBE, it has nothing to do with > > modulation? > > > > Or just maybe, US consumers are truly unwilling to use OTA TV, whereas > > consumers in Australia know it exists? > > Bert, Occam's razor. Australia has a ton of boxes. They're a DVB country. > Italy has tons of boxes. They're a DVB country. The UK has tons of boxes, > too. They are a DVB country. The United States has very few boxes. They > are an ATSC country. > > John > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.