Craig Birkmaier wrote: >> Every change in a deployed standard comes at a price. If >> you have to pick a time when an upgrade is to be >> implemented, you're better off making sure the upgrade >> is an obvious improvement. In the case of the BBC, >> introducing HDTV in a market with no HDTV and no >> deployed MPEG-2 MP at HL boxes at all, it's no big >> shakes to go to H.264. In countries where HDTV is >> deployed and working just fine, I would wait until >> something more efficient comes along. > > You mean like the difference between multichannel services > with hundreds of channels versus a dying broadcast model > with 5-10 programs per market? I already posted a logical time to upgrade the codec in DTT, without having to ask for more frequency channels. The best time is when an existing MPEG-2 HDTV channel can be reduced to SDTV, and a simulcast HDTV channel simulcast in the same channel, with no more bit rate than what the MPEG-2 HD stream occupied before. That way, no one is disenfranchised during the transition, HDTV viewers are encouraged to switch quickly, and no extra spectrum is needed during the transition. So, even though many seem to resist accepting this, it appears from the BBC HDTV real-world testing that H.264 is not the codec that would permit such a transition plan. Nor would it change that considerably the multichannel aspects of DTT. They don't say anything about image quality, but the Sky plan for their subscription DTT service was to pack 4 SD streams where 3 SD streams are now, using H.264 instead of H.262. Presumably, this could be done at similar image quality. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.