[opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: "John Shutt" <shuttj@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:00:39 -0500
Bert,
I give up. You have no data suggesting what MPEG-2 HD data rate would have
been acceptable to the BBC, nor do you have any data suggesting what MPEG-4
HD data rate would equal MPEG-2 image impairment.
Again, you don't know if the BBC would have deemed 40 Mbps, displacing 9 or
10 SD channels, to be the minimum required for MPEG-2 HD, since they didn't
even test MPEG-2 HD. How you can jump to the conclusion that MPEG-2 and
MPEG-4 are essentially equal in bitrate requirements when use in HD is
beyond me, beyond logic, and not supported by any data.
John.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
"More efficient" can mean anything you like. The fact that you need to
displace 3 to 4 SDTV programs to make room for one H.264 program is a
real tough elephant to miss in the room, John.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
"More efficient" can mean anything you like. The fact that you need to displace 3 to 4 SDTV programs to make room for one H.264 program is a real tough elephant to miss in the room, John.
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Manfredi, Albert E