[opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Cliff Benham <flyback1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:41:46 -0500
What bearing or force does ANSI/SMPTE 170M-1994 [SMPTE 1267, April 19,
1996]
have on this discussion?
Mark Schubin wrote:
It was published in IETS-1 in November 1977.
TTFN,
Mark
Barry Brown wrote:
Mark,
Almost but may not be not completely right - There was no RS-170A
standard published by EIA, but I'm almost positive the RS-170A
waveform spec was published. I know because I spent some years (don't
remember how long) working on this drawing.
Barry Brown
On Feb 17, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Mark Schubin wrote:
John Willkie wrote:
Now, you've got me confused, Mark.
It's an interesting quirk of fate.
NTC-7 is real. RS-250B and EIA-250C are real.
There was never any such standard as RS-170A. There certainly was
an RS-170 for monochrome TV, and there is agreement on what RS-170A
would have been, had there ever been one. But broadcasters did not
want to create an RS-170A until they were ready for it, lest the FCC
adopt it as part of the rules and they be fined for violating them.
So, instead, there is EIA IETS-1 (the first, and possibly only,
Industrial Electronics Tentative Standard), which specifies the
subcarrier-to-horizontal-sync relationship that everyone thinks
comes from the non-existent RS-170A.
TTFN,
Mark
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Cliff Benham
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Ron Economos
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Ron Economos
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Ron Economos
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Ron Economos
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Barry Brown
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- » [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
It was published in IETS-1 in November 1977. TTFN, Mark Barry Brown wrote:
Mark,Almost but may not be not completely right - There was no RS-170A standard published by EIA, but I'm almost positive the RS-170A waveform spec was published. I know because I spent some years (don't remember how long) working on this drawing.Barry Brown On Feb 17, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Mark Schubin wrote:John Willkie wrote:Now, you've got me confused, Mark.It's an interesting quirk of fate. NTC-7 is real. RS-250B and EIA-250C are real.There was never any such standard as RS-170A. There certainly was an RS-170 for monochrome TV, and there is agreement on what RS-170A would have been, had there ever been one. But broadcasters did not want to create an RS-170A until they were ready for it, lest the FCC adopt it as part of the rules and they be fined for violating them.So, instead, there is EIA IETS-1 (the first, and possibly only, Industrial Electronics Tentative Standard), which specifies the subcarrier-to-horizontal-sync relationship that everyone thinks comes from the non-existent RS-170A.TTFN, Mark
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Cliff Benham
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Ron Economos
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Ron Economos
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Ron Economos
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Ron Economos
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Barry Brown
- [opendtv] Re: Food for thought
- From: Mark Schubin