[opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- From: "Albert Manfredi" <bert22306@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 15:09:18 -0500
Tom Barry wrote:
The numbers I'd like to know have more to do with what is the value
added of a local channel? Do people really want local channels because
they are local? Or do they just associate the more popular local
channels with the network channels?
The national network content obviously has a vastly greater economy
of scale and basically can have a lot more money invested in it based
upon the expected number of viewers.
I don't think there's much question on this. What people holler about to
their local cable systems is when the local system refuses to carry the
major network content, for whatever reason. It' loss of prime time content
people get upset about, not the local ads from the used car dealership
downtown. Not the insipid infomercials that broadcasters love to transmit
off prime time.
I'd expect a local source of weather and occassional news would satisfy most
people.
But this doesn't change anything about the viability of DTT. A viable DTT
system does not depend on "localism" at all, as abundantly made obvious in
Europe. It does depend on offering a "wide enough" variety of content,
though. *If* it's true that people are abandoning OTA TV and going to cable
or DBS, the oh-so-obvious solution to that is to use DTT's new features to
make it more attractive than OTA analog is and was.
Assuming, that is, that broadcasters have any interest in doing so. It's
equally obvious to me that if broadcasters prefer to get people addicted to
umbillical services, no one and nothing will stem the erosion of OTA TV. I'm
actually lucky to have two Sinclair stations within reach, since they seem
to be about the only ones using their hours productively.
I'm often amazed that OTA TV is as successful as it is. I'm always amazed
when my friends explain how they use OTA TV, without having anyone shove it
down their throats as other TV media do.
Bert
_________________________________________________________________
Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series. Who will win?
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://davevscarl.spaces.live.com/?icid=T001MSN38C07001
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- From: John Willkie
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- » [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
The numbers I'd like to know have more to do with what is the value added of a local channel? Do people really want local channels because they are local? Or do they just associate the more popular local channels with the network channels? The national network content obviously has a vastly greater economy of scale and basically can have a lot more money invested in it based upon the expected number of viewers.
- [opendtv] Re: Fewer than 2 Million have OTA DTV in US
- From: John Willkie