[opendtv] FCC report on cable industry prices
- From: "Albert Manfredi" <bert22306@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:22:19 -0500
Just before the holidays began, a new item said that this was forthcoming.
Well, here it is.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf
In the intro section:
-------------------------
Overall, cable prices increased more than 5 percent last year and by 93
percent since the period immediately prior to Congress?s enactment of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996. Expanded basic prices rose more than 6
percent or twice the rate of inflation last year. Prices are 17 percent
lower where wireline cable competition is present. DBS competition, however,
does not appear to constrain cable prices ? average prices are the same as
or slightly higher in communities where DBS was the basis for a finding of
effective competition than in noncompetitive communities. Finally, increases
in programming expenses were equivalent to more than half of the overall
increase in prices for the basic and expanded basic tiers.
--------------------------
They show graphs indicating that the only type of competition that does
anything to stem the price inflation is to have another cable operator in a
community. On the other hand, comptetition from DBS alone does essentially
no good.
Here are the closing paragraphs of the main section of the report:
--------------------------------------
V. ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS
31. In Appendix B of this report, we use econometric analysis to provide a
more sophisticated examination of the data collected. As described in
Appendix B, we estimate the effect of market structure and other factors on
cable prices. Our results show that cable prices tend to be higher in local
MVPD markets where cable operators have a larger share of the market. This
relationship may indicate an exploitation of market power by dominant firms
or may reflect higher costs to serve these markets. In addition, we find
that prices tend to be lower in areas served by vertically integrated cable
operators than in areas served by unintegrated cable operators, suggesting
that vertically integrated operators pass some of their cost savings to
their subscribers. Complete results are described in Appendix B.
VI. CONCLUSIONS
32. Cable systems found to face effective competition continue to exhibit
lower prices than cable systems that serve communities in which no such
finding has been made. As in previous years, the competitive differential
varied, with the largest differential occurring in communities with a second
cable operator. Overall, for the 12 months ending January 1, 2005, cable
prices rose at an average rate of 5.2 percent, compared with general
inflation of 3.0 percent for the year ending January 2005.
------------------------------------------
Seems to me, communities with a high penetration of cable are also those
with much less than adequate OTA offerings, and perhaps also those in which
a large percentage of the population is apartment dwellers, with no good OTA
reception option. I have to believe all these factors are intertwined.
Bert
_________________________________________________________________
Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football Page
www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] FCC report on cable industry prices