[opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- From: Albert Manfredi <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:00:26 -0400
Cliff Benham wrote:
> Here's today's list of complaints about the new STBs
> from members of the AudioKarma list. Why weren't the
> boxes properly field tested by consumers so they
> would not have to find out there are problems with
> them only *AFTER* buying them?
I can't tell if some of these are problems with a specific unit, or design
problems. Or maybe a bit of both.
> "The Zenith/Insignia (they're identical) have a really
> low audio output level (even at 100% volume setting).
Is this true? This sounds like operator error or a faulty box. Does this
complaint sound remotely like the box is meant to work that way? Not to me.
Case in point. The Accurian HD box from 2004 does not have an internal volume
control. The almost identical Digital Stream HD3150plus does have, but who
knew? The remote control certainly doesn't give a clue.
So when I first set up the HD3150plus, after having had the Accurian for
several weeks, the super low volume concerned me. Very soon, though, searching
the menus, I found the internal volume setting and the problem was solved.
Could this situation be similar?
> The Zenith/Insignia does not pass-thru the antenna
> when powered off.
When NTSC goes off, no one will care about this, unless they really do watch
LPTV.
> My Digitalstream makes a high-pitched whistle when
> powered off. It's subtle but you can't sleep in a silent
> room with it plugged in. Anybody else notice this?
I'd like an answer to that last question. If this is a design problem, it
should certainly be addressed by Digital Stream. Or pull the plug when you're
trying to sleep.
The rest of the complaints are basically frivolous, IMO. Hey, a box that costs
you $10 is allowed to look a little cheap, okay?
Craig wrote:
> The NTIA dropped the ball, in large part because they
> were not qualified to handle the assigned task. They
> approached this task as a bureaucracy would, not as a
> manufacturer would in trying to develop a product to
> meet the market requirements.
This is overstated, IMO.
The NTIA certainly appears to have had this blind spot about LPTV stations and
their transition schedule. But the fallout from that oversight should be
minimal. The fact that journalists are milking the goof for all it's worth does
not change the fact that it's not a big deal, as problems go.
Aside from that one issue, I don't think any of the problems Cliff listed are
problems the NTIA should have had to prevent with new coupon-box-specific
specifications. For example, line level audio outputs are supposed to provide
roughly 1 V rms at max output volume for all audio equipment. The NTIA should
certainly NOT have had to re-specify all audio/video CE equipment standards for
this D/A converter program. A CE vendor that knows anything at all knows what
the interface specifications are.
In short, I think this is more of the same persistent, and mostly gratuitous,
complaining that has dogged the US DTV transition from the very beginning.
Bert
_________________________________________________________________
In a rush? Get real-time answers with Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_realtime_042008
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- From: Craig Birkmaier
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- » [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- [opendtv] Re: Dueling Statutes?
- From: Craig Birkmaier