[opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- From: Dave Bittner <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:40:38 -0400
On Jul 30, 2007, at Monday, July 30, 20077:06 PM, johnwillkie wrote:
What’s wrong with this calculation?
What's wrong with the calculation, from the info I've been able to
gather, is that you're mistakenly thinking that the FIOS internet and
TV services are sharing the same allocated bandwidth to the home.
They are not.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060202-6104.html
"In short, there's almost no cause for concern that Verizon's own
traffic will relegate other services to the dark alleys of the Fios
network. The video is actually being delivered on a separate
wavelength from the other services. According to Sirbu, roughly
3.5Gbps of the network's capacity will be allocated for downstream
video. That leaves 620Mbps of bandwidth for 'Net traffic, which is
split up between the 32 users on each Broadband Passive Optical
Network node. Once Verizon switches to Gigabit PON, that number will
rise to 2.4Gbps. Video on demand will be delivered via IPTV."
and, from this page:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=571&page=2
"The most important aspect of FiOS is its massive bandwidth
capacity. The current implementation of FiOS uses a technology
called BPON (Broadband Passive Optical Networking) which offers 622
mbps of total down-stream and 155 mbps up-stream bandwidth split
amongst 32 homes for Internet access and the current premium FiOS
Internet service caps users to 50 mbps down-stream for burst speed.
FiOS TV broadcasts come over a separate wavelength using a technology
called GPON (Gigabit Passive Optical Networking) which supports 2.4
gbps down and 1.2 gbps up. Since it’s a broadcast technology, the
downstream doesn’t have to be split amongst 32 homes so it can offer
a massive number of high-quality video broadcasts to every home.
Video-on-demand on the other hand requires a unicast technology and
that’s delivered using IPTV technology over the BPON data channels."
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
- [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- From: flyback1
- [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- From: johnwillkie
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- » [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
What’s wrong with this calculation?
- [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
- [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- From: flyback1
- [opendtv] Re: Digital Better Than Analog?
- From: johnwillkie