John S. Wrote: > No, they are not leaked eyewitness reports. I have the MSTV > report in .PDF format, and it clearly shows that at 6' COFDM > beat 8-VSB for all channels. Thanks John, I first heard about it confidentially and I'm a little fuzzy in my recollection of the full reports details, which I no longer have. The important point is that it did happen and it is documented. > Further, as I recall, Sinclair was made privy to the preliminary > data as it was being gathered, and noticed immediately that > 8-VSB was outperforming COFDM at the 30 foot antenna level, < but COFDM was beating 8-VSB at the 6 foot level, at the same > sites! This red flag led them to discover the wide > front end of the DVTM2000(T), and to point it out to the MSTV/NAB > testers. > The testers said that over half of the sites were already tested, < so if there were any questions regarding the performance of the > DVTM200(T), they would be addressed in the Phase II testing. > > Phase II testing never occurred. That is also correct. I was personally involved with Sinclair and we jointly presented arguments before the full MSTV committee regarding the DVTM2000(T) front end issue. Sinclair had made that preliminary test information available before the meeting and upon reading it, the COFDM receiver's front-end deficiency "jumped out" at any reader who had a receiver design understanding and a transmitter signal testing background. We were both befuddled by the fact that the test engineers "failed" to recognize this problem. We argued that issue before the committee without resolution but the testers promised to address it in Phase Two, which was to occur as part of the original test criteria. Phase Two turned out to be another Red Herring. The joint MSTV/NAB executive committee immediately canceled it and the receiver issue was never considered, other than by the sages on this forum. As you may recall, Sinclair had followed this up by testing an identical receiver at those same sites but with the addition of a simple front-end bandpass filter and they reported vastly improved performance. However, this information was also never officially addressed. > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Shutt > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 2:32 PM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Re: Demand for free DTV rising in Australia > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dale Kelly" <dalekelly@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > These are the same leaked eye witness reports a heard regarding the > > MSTV/NAB > > tests, even though they were not in the official report or in the > > debriefings I attended in Washington. These tests were > purposely not open > > to > > outside scrutiny, unlike the earlier Sinclair demos. > > Dale, > > No, they are not leaked eyewitness reports. I have the MSTV > report in .PDF > format, and it clearly shows that at 6' COFDM beat 8-VSB for all > channels. > It also shows a graph that shows the angle of reception, which > was recorded > for every location, every channel, and both formats as part of > the original > data gathering. > > Further, as I recall, Sinclair was made privy to the preliminary > data as it > was being gathered, and noticed immediately that 8-VSB was outperforming > COFDM at the 30 foot antenna level, but COFDM was beating 8-VSB at the 6 > foot level, at the same sites! This red flag led them to > discover the wide > front end of the DVTM2000(T), and to point it out to the MSTV/NAB > testers. > The testers said that over half of the sites were already tested, so if > there were any questions regarding the performance of the > DVTM200(T), they > would be addressed in the Phase II testing. > > Phase II testing never occurred. > > John > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration > settings at FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the > word unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.