Add all those users together, and they're still a small fraction of the "compression" on the internet, since Windows Media is the king there, and they aren't listed. "We're the top video codec in satellite radio." John Willkie -----Mensaje original----- De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Tom Barry Enviado el: Thursday, June 28, 2007 4:05 AM Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Asunto: [opendtv] Re: Demand for free DTV rising in Australia I had almost forgotten about the Duck (now On2) and your statement surprised me. But it may well be true as I guess they are the underlying technology behind Flash and some others now. - Tom ------------------------------------ About On2 Technologies On2 Technologies (Amex: ONT) is a leading technology firm at the forefront of digital video compression. The company revolutionized digital media delivery with the creation of its advanced full-motion, full-screen On2 Video compression and streaming technologies. On2 Video codecs are widely used in the Internet, video-on-demand, VoIP, and mobile media markets. On2's software is used by such leading global companies as Adobe/Macromedia, AOL, Skype, XM Satellite Radio, Sony, CTTNet, VitalStream, and Tencent. Located in Tarrytown, NY, the company has R&D offices in Clifton Park, NY, and Cambridge, UK. To contact On2, write to sales@xxxxxxx or visit http://www.on2.com. ------------------------------------- Bob Miller wrote: > Should add that was for the Duck Corporation's compression technology > from 1997 before MPEG4. I think it is the most widely used on the > Internet now. > > Bob Miller > > On 6/27/07, Bob Miller <robmxa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> If addressed to me I am not beating any dead horse foreign or >> otherwise. Take a look back at my post you will see that I was never >> in favor of DVB-H. Like DVB-T and DMB-T/H. >> >> We looked at DVB-H and concluded that it was a kludge meant to address >> the power problem of cell phones. Thought that the battery, chip >> makers etc. should solve that problem. Didn't like the idea of mini >> movies and didn't see a business in partnering with cellular >> companies. >> >> Do believe in ubiquitous reception of DTV portable, fixed and mobile. >> Think there is lots of content out there and more to come. Don't think >> broadcasters have any kind of lock on it. Think a majority of the >> current crop of OTA broadcasters will sell in the next few years. >> >> Have been for DVB-T, DMB-T/H, MPEG4. Against MPEG2 (not transport), >> interlace and 8-VSB. >> >> My horses don't need beating, they are doing all right. >> >> Bob Miller >> >> On 6/27/07, johnwillkie <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > YOU are so far removed from reality, it's startling. >> > >> > I have a friend who sells professional digital plants around the world. >> > He's a 'nominal' ATSC member, but he sells in all markets, with the >> possible >> > exception of Japan, and buys from all countries, with the possible >> exception >> > of China. >> > >> > Several years ago, I mentioned on this list that DVB-M/H test and >> > transmission gear was a hot commodity, due to a conversation he and >> I had >> > had. >> > >> > That's not the case now. We were talking the other day about the >> ATSC mobile >> > proposals. He mentioned that the timing might be about right, since >> > "DVB-M/H is dead." >> > >> > "What about all the trials: Paris, UK?" He also mentioned the Italian >> > trials. "All the trials are over," he said, and "nobody is buying any >> > gear." There is no action, no inquiries, nothing. >> > >> > By the way, he wasn't speaking of just his own sales and inquiries. >> > >> > So, bob, you've now gone from beating a "foreign" horse to beating a >> dead >> > foreign horse. >> > >> > There were telos interested in m-h. Bow, all they need is interested >> > customers, and a way to 'make money' when they don't own the content >> and >> > have to "buy it at retail" and "sell at wholesale." >> > >> > Broadcasters, of course, have the 'content.' Not to mention largely >> owning >> > the position "we don't charge viewers anything." >> > >> > John Willkie, who can't wait to see (and probably oppose) the Qualcomm >> > proposal. >> > >> > -----Mensaje original----- >> > De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En >> > nombre de Bob Miller >> > Enviado el: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:27 PM >> > Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Asunto: [opendtv] Re: Demand for free DTV rising in Australia >> > >> > So far, ignoring 8-VSB for the most part, they are making the right >> > decision whether informed or not. >> > >> > The fact is they are informed and if a decent modulation was allowed >> > in the US tomorrow they would all be very active participants in its >> > rapid and wildly successful success. Just like in most other >> > countries. >> > >> > Bob Miller >> > >> > On 6/21/07, Manfredi, Albert E <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > Dale Kelly wrote: >> > > >> > > >> New Zealand too, they have or want to install a DBS-based >> > > >> Freeview system too. Because in those countries, they DO NOT >> > > >> expect 100 percent coverage with COFDM. >> > > > >> > > > That's argument is a bit of a reach. >> > > > New Zealand is very mountainous and has a significant rural >> > > > population that simply can't be economically covered by OTA >> > > > service. This indeed has nothing to do with modulation but >> > > > I would wager that, watt for watt, they will achieve more >> > > > reliable OTA service using COFDM. >> > > >> > > ATSC is the only game in town in the US, for free TV to all the wide >> > > open spaces and mountainous regions. So if someone argues that >> Freeview >> > > is not being forced on the cable companies, surely the fact that >> FOTA TV >> > > here is not being forced on DBS must figure in there somewhere? >> > > >> > > In any event, corporate heavies are guided by what they are told at >> > > meetings. As long as there is this peristent pessimism concerning >> ATSC, >> > > festering there without being proven or disproven, it does nothing >> more >> > > than cause paralysis among their ranks. Add to this the sometimes >> > > outrageous claims made about the competition, claims that defy the >> laws >> > > of physics, and all I can think is let's have another set of >> comparison >> > > tests. I don't see this persistent gloom disappearing anytime soon, >> > > without such tests. >> > > >> > > Poorly informed people make wrong decisions. It's that simple. >> > > >> > > Bert >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >> > > >> > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration >> settings at >> > FreeLists.org >> > > >> > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the >> word >> > unsubscribe in the subject line. >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >> > >> > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >> > FreeLists.org >> > >> > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >> > unsubscribe in the subject line. >> > >> > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >> > >> > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings >> at FreeLists.org >> > >> > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the >> word unsubscribe in the subject line. >> > >> > >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > -- Tom Barry trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.