[opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- From: Richard Hollandsworth <holl_ands@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
I also believe this story has been mis-reported.
Presuming that the HD-DVD/Blu-Ray Players would follow the lead of current
Upconverting
DVD Players (lo-rez only via Component Video and hi-rez only via HDCP covered
DVI/HDMI),
I would expect the following:
1. The HDMI port would only work with HDCP compliant DVI and HDMI ports for
hi-rez.
2. Since most current HDTVs will only accept 480p/720p/1080i, the HDMI port
should
selectively down convert anything that is higher than this (e.g. 1080p).
3. HDTV's with non-HDCP compliant DVI ports would only work lo-rez (if at all).
[That's why I insisted my HDTV had a HDCP capable DVI port.]
[Sorry Charlie, if yours doesn't do HDCP correctly.]
4. Component Video interface would only work at lo-rez (if any are even
allowed).
[Sorry Charlie, if yours doesn't have DVI/HDCP or HDMI.]
[At least you can still watch lo-rez DVD's and HD Television.]
I'm also concerned whether they are going to enforce encryption in order to
play back the hi-rez Surround Sound tracks. That would force most of us to buy
a new Surround Sound Receiver that has an HDMI sound interface. [Bye, Bye DD
Optical and Coax.]
HDMI Spec seems to indicate that up to 8 channels of 192 kSps Audio can be
supported concurrently with the highest resolution/refresh setting of
1920x1080p at 60 Hz.
This seems to be within the 165 Mpixel/sec limit of a Type A HDMI (Single
Channel) interface.
So why is a Type B HDMI (Dual Channel) interface included in the HDMI spec if
it is never needed????
Under what conditions would we be surprised (again!!!), forcing yet another
upgrade to a Dual Channel capable system???
Of course, we won't actually know until we see these players from a variety of
suppliers.
FCC??? Since when does the FCC have any jurisdiction over HD-DVD Players???
<holl_ands>
=============================================================
John Golitsis <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Unlike DVI, HDMI automatically includes HDCP.
I believe this story has been mis-reported. For HD DVD, DVI with
HDCP should work just fine for all output resolutions except 1080p.
On 23-Aug-05, at 10:50 AM, Joy, Patrick wrote:
> The real problem is the Monitor and the fact it was not HDCP
> compliant.
> So we should be discussing HDCP not HDMI.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- From: Richard Hollandsworth
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- From: John Golitsis
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- » [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- From: Richard Hollandsworth
- [opendtv] Re: Defining Visions: They've Done It To Us Again. . .???!!!
- From: John Golitsis