[opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs
- From: Albert Manfredi <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:05:55 -0500
Cliff Benham wrote:
> In reality, just like the cable and satellite companies
> today, all [the bell companies] wanted was to keep those
> equipment rental fees coming in every month.
Congress giveth, and Congress could take away.
It looks like Congress gave the FCC the authority to make th rules for consumer
device compatibility with cable systems, in 1992, which the FCC did in 47 CFR
76.630. So this applied to analog basic tier channels, and they had to be
unscrambled.
When digital cable appeared on the scene, the FCC wrote 47 CFR 76.640, which
does not specifically discuss a "digital basic tier," and instead it does
discuss this POD device requirement for DTV sets, to unscramble the digital
tier signals. Presumably, at the time, the "basic tier" was assumed to be
analog.
At the same time, the broadcast flag issue was still alive, so the NCTA
petitioned the FCC to allow the scrambling of the digital tier to be used as a
de facto implementation of a broadcast flag compliant technology (MB Docket
02-230).
In this letter, the NCTA petitions the FCC to adjust the old rules of 76.630
(which were written for analog and no issue with broadcast flag) for a digital
basic tier ruling which would not read like 76.630.
Since then, as I showed previously, the FCC gives cable systems the option of
several ways to transmit their basic tier (OTA channels), in analog or in
digital. And never in any of this does the FCC mandate use of clearQAM, that I
have found. Even though in principle, now that the broadcast flag was
determined to be beyond the FCC's charter, the FCC could mandate something
along those lines.
Enfin bref, while it is easily shown that FOTA stations cannot copy protect or
scramble content that they transmit free (over the air), in the wording of 17
USC 1201 and the wording of the Betamax decision, I don't see anywhere that
such provisions apply to anything transmitted over digital cable. And it's not
a leap to include DBS in this too.
And then of course, cable companies are allowed to decide when to dismantle
their analog tier.
Still, Congress could decide to change all of this. Possibly, a
Democrat-controlled Congress could tell the FCC to reword 76.630, I would
think, to explicitly mention clearQAM for a digital basic tier.
Bert
_________________________________________________________________
It’s the same Hotmail®. If by “same” you mean up to 70% faster.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad1_122008
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Monty Solomon
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Cliff Benham
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - John Willkie
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - John Willkie
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Cliff Benham
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - John Willkie
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Albert Manfredi
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - John Willkie