[opendtv] Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs
- From: Monty Solomon <monty@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: undisclosed-recipient:;
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:34:20 -0500
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081226-comcast-sued-for-not-selling-set-top-boxes-cablecards.html
Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs
By Nate Anderson | Published: December 26, 2008 - 08:05AM CT
Cheryl Corralejo is mad as hell at Comcast, and she isn't going to
take it anymore. The object of her righteous crusade? Cable box
rentals. Corralejo wants to own her box outright, and she has filed a
class action complaint on behalf of all other Californians who
desperately want to stop paying monthly fees just for a bit of
decryption equipment.
The case, filed in federal court in California, began in late
November and was recently unearthed by Multichannel News. Comcast has
yet to respond.
The gist of the case, according to a copy of the complaint seen by
Ars Technica, is rental fees. Corralejo argues that Comcast has a
monopoly over video service in her area and that it uses that
monopoly power to force her to use decryption equipment, which
Corralejo cannot purchase outright. After only a few months, alleges
the complaint, end users have already paid Comcast more than the box
is worth.
Reading the complaint through is an odd experience, because the first
pages sound like something written when the whole CableCARD debate
was pending before the Federal Communications Commission. In the end,
the FCC forced the industry to separate out its decryption equipment
into a physical CableCARD that could be acquired separately from a
cable company box and could be inserted into any third-party video
gear that supported it. In other words, renting a cable box has not
actually been a requirement of cable operators for years.
On page six, the complaint finally gets around to the point,
acknowledging it but arguing that CableCARDs aren't the equivalent of
set-top boxes. The complaint quotes from Comcast's own website, which
points out that "the full range of interactive services" may not be
available with a CableCARD, as current host devices generally support
only one-way operation.
In addition, Corralejo complains that the CableCARD still has to be
rented from the company; it cannot be purchased outright. There's
simply no way to avoid some form of rental fee. (Comcast's website
indicates that the first CableCARD a customer needs is included in
the monthly bill, however; only additional CableCARDs cost money,
currently "up to $2.05" a month.)
These practices are called "unlawful tying" under the Sherman
Antitrust Act, as well as a violation of California's business and
professions code.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Monty Solomon
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Cliff Benham
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - John Willkie
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - John Willkie
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Cliff Benham
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - John Willkie
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - Albert Manfredi
- » [opendtv] Re: Comcast sued for not selling set-top boxes, CableCARDs - John Willkie