http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298708A1.pdf It's worth a read. Chairman Copps is trying to make a case, to Silicon Valley people, for reclassifying broadband access as a telecom service. His argument is that broadband access is controlled now by too few companies, these companies can prioritize traffic, these companies have little incentive to provide service in difficult areas, and that therefore the more stringent regs of a telecom service would protect consumers. Partly believable. The counterargument being that just like telephone service, the strict telecom regs mean huge burdens to the broadband providers, such as lifeline service freebies for example, and we all know what that does to costs to the consumer. Ever looked at your phone bill, even for ancient POTS? No mention of that. He even mentions, as if it were a good idea, the Telecom Act of 1996. As if that act did not all by itself create a huge obstacle to broadband deployment. (E.g. by giving burdens and no rewards to telecom companies wanting to deploy broadband.) Another argument he makes is about how the news media have been decimated. Quoting: "Newsrooms have been shuttered, reporters taken off the beat and fired, and investigative journalism put on the endangered species list. Some try to tell us this is the natural result of changes in technology and markets, but the facts tell another story. Truth be told, in the case of traditional media, whether newspapers or broadcasting, it was bad choices by the private sector (through heedless consolidation that saddled companies with unmanageable debt) and even worse choices by government (through the FCC's evisceration of the public interest protections that had undergirded the country's media landscape) that visited such harm on the American people, on our democracy and, ironically, on even the media companies themselves." Seems hard to believe. These media are being eviscerated by loss of consumer interest, if anything, and universal broadband access can only accelerate that process. When you have virtually unlimited sources of news and information, it becomes that much more difficult for the elite few to survive. Maybe an even smaller number of "elites" MIGHT have a shot, among all the Internet mediocrity, but I honestly fail to see how government regulation can save the day here. Sounds like, "Trust me, increased government involvement can truly deliver these conflicting goals." I'm skeptical. I also marvel at how people can be so impassioned by arguments that at best so ambiguous. Sort of like those who Truly Believe in that Iris engine. At a certain age, surely everyone comes to understand that none of these issues are ever so cut and dried? Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.