[opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- From: "Bob Miller" <robmxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:28:39 -0400
Would it work if the end user was part of a co-op that stored and
forwarded content to members I wonder? There was someone I was talking
to in Canada that was doing this with MythTV in his home for his
neighbors as I remember it.
Bob Miller
On 3/26/07, Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 11:20 AM -0400 3/26/07, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
>I suppose this ruling makes it even more desirable to incorporate
>digital receivers in recording devices available to consumers. And
>again, what they call "remote-storage DVR" in this piece is actually a
>device inside the cable network, not on consumer premises.
>
This decision was expected. I have been writing about this for years.
The Fair Use legislation and rulings apply only to the consumer, not
a middleman trying to make a buck leveraging the content owned by
others.
That being said, on demand viewing of copyrighted content is a huge
growing business for cable. But this requires that the cable company
obtain the rights to the content and share the revenues generated.
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- From: Craig Birkmaier
- References:
- [opendtv] Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- » [opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- » [opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- » [opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- » [opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- » [opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- » [opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- » [opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
At 11:20 AM -0400 3/26/07, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: >I suppose this ruling makes it even more desirable to incorporate >digital receivers in recording devices available to consumers. And >again, what they call "remote-storage DVR" in this piece is actually a >device inside the cable network, not on consumer premises. > This decision was expected. I have been writing about this for years. The Fair Use legislation and rulings apply only to the consumer, not a middleman trying to make a buck leveraging the content owned by others. That being said, on demand viewing of copyrighted content is a huge growing business for cable. But this requires that the cable company obtain the rights to the content and share the revenues generated. Regards Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
- [opendtv] Re: Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- From: Craig Birkmaier
- [opendtv] Cablevision to appeal network DVR ruling
- From: Manfredi, Albert E