[opendtv] Re: COFDM and equalization

  • From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:31:21 -0400

At 8:11 AM -0400 4/21/04, Allen Le Roy Limberg wrote:
>I think you have it backwards, Craig.  COFDM needs higher power to reach
>same radius, which makes it a worse co-channel interferor to other signals
>than QAM or 8VSB.

This is only true for the single big stick topology. This is NOT the 
way to build a modern transmission network. The GOAL is to deliver 
enough signal throughout the desired coverage area, while minimizing 
signal delivered into adjacent markets. This is relatively easy to 
accomplish using a network of lower powered transmitters with proper 
masks to keep the signal where it is wanted. Bottom line you get 
better coverage at lower emission power levels. The infrastructure 
costs a bit more to build, but less to operate in terms of the power 
bill -at the expense of needing to distribute synchronized signals to 
each transmitter. Fortunately, it is now possible to synchronize the 
transmitters cheaply.

Reards
Craig
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: