Craig Birkmaier wrote: > One could make a strong argument that > broadcasters COULD have pushed for a much > different approach to DTV, one that would > have placed the service on a competitive par > with MVPD services. The success of Freeview > and other multi-channel terrestrial services > in Europe demonstrates that such an approach > would have been viable; With this part I can certainly agree. Unfortunately, for a combination of reasons, it wasn't until AFTER the transition ended that broadcasters seem to have taken an interest in thinking about how best to use their multicast capacity. The blame went to chicken/egg all those transition years, and I think they were several other reasons. Somehow, some of the Europeans countries found a way to make it work. > And one must seriously question the wisdom of > both broadcasters and their regulators, to make > major investments to SUSTAIN a business that is > now irrelevant to the vast majority of U.S. Or so you continue to hope. Broadcasters have had their environment changed, both by the congloms selling off their own OTA assets, and by the transition ending. So 6 months after the transition ended is not the time to be grabbing at the spectrum. Not if broadcasters are finally getting their act together, which it seems like they are. And for a federal agency to do this is in very poor taste. Bert _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.