[opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Nix Low-Power DTS Proposal

  • From: "John Shutt" <shuttj@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:47:23 -0500

The land acquisition costs and engineering maintenance staff increases alone would kill most local broadcasters.


Start up Craig's Spectrum Utility model, or something similar to the Crown Castle/BBC multiplex, and you might have something. But the hardest part is getting from point A to point B without bankrupting all of your potential spectrum utility customers in the process.

Since almost every station in the country bought new transmitters in the past 5 years, it'll take another 15 before they're amortized enough to make it economically feasible to switch to a spectrum utility model.

John

----- Original Message ----- From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:28 AM
Subject: [opendtv] Broadcasters Nix Low-Power DTS Proposal


http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/93858

Broadcasters Nix Low-Power DTS Proposal
01.28.2010.

The NAB and MSTV, acting as representatives for the nation's broadcasters, filed comments with the FCC on Jan. 27 pledging "full and constructive participation" in that agency's broadband plan, but at the same time, denouncing a proposal from the Consumer Electronics Association and CTIA-The Wireless Association for transitioning U.S. television broadcasting to a low-power distributed transmission system (DTS) as impractical. The NAB and MSTV were united in their opinion that the DTS plan was not workable due to loss of coverage and interference problems.

"Coverage gaps are the unavoidable consequence of trying to use a fill-in technology such as DTS as an across-the-board substitute for the current delivery system of over-the-air DTV," the broadcast groups said.

NAB and MSTV also stated that the proposal to use DTS to create spectrum "drastically underestimated" costs that would have to be absorbed to make such a transition for television broadcasting, saying they would be "orders of magnitude higher than estimates provided by CTIA/CEA."

The two broadcast groups did agree with several aspects of FCC submissions filed by the Department of Justice and NTIA, saying that a comprehensive inventory of present and future spectrum availability and usage was required.

NAB/NTIA noted that neither the DOJ nor NTIA called for reallocation of broadcast television spectrum, but did term the agencies' assumption that a lack of spectrum is limiting competition in the area of broadband communications.

"There is no necessary nexus between allocating additional spectrum and increased broadband deployment and use," the groups said. "Many countries with higher broadband usage rates than the United States have less spectrum allocated for broadband purposes."

The NAB/NTIA filing also noted that the implementation of a mobile DTV system by television broadcasters would provide consumers with high-quality video in real time.




----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.






----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: