Craig Birkmaier wrote: > No it's BAD. > > Ther only reason that it is possible to generate higher than average profits > is that they have an protected oligopoly, and now a second revenue stream > from competitors. No, it's simply not. You seem to have lost the thread. First, there are multiple congloms, competing against one another. Second, in every case, these congloms make their premium material available FOTA. And have not even indicated that they will stop doing so. And thirdly, the MVPDs have it in their power, any time they choose, to unshackle their subscribers. And by so doing, to give back to the congloms more precisely what is their due. Giving them far less leverage in manufacturing overly high rates. The failure in the overall business model is caused by the anti-competitive nature of MVPDs, not by the demands of the content owners. And by the way, Apple's high prices are similarly afflicted by this walled garden model, closed ecosystem, which reduces the beneficial effects of competition. It's amazing to me that you can continue to be so inconsistent. > The proposal is to take the money the telcos spend for spectrum and give a > sizeable portion of it to broadcasters who are willing to give up their > spectrum. They are not handing anything over; WE will pay through the nose > for this spectrum as the telcos will pass these costs to consumers. Let me explain it more explicitly, then. The Feds, in an appearance of being in the pockets of the greediest of the greediest companies, want to yank back spectrum from FOTA broadcasting to hand it to companies that not only have a habit of charging rapidly increasing monthly fees, but also of working hard to freeze out any competition. Through what appears to be underhanded deals (such as GM wrt satellite radio, or CE vendors who seem to do everything to favor MVPDs, in the US). Given that this TV spectrum is hardly ideal for the purposes the FCC is trumpeting, it's hard to overlook how the Feds kindly handing over the FOTA spectrum to the greediest of greediest does NOT have an appearance of fishy business. And sure, the clueless consumers seem happy to oblige. I've said that innumerable times, Craig. Who do you think pays ultimately? Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.