[opendtv] Re: Australia DTV
- From: "dalekelly@xxxxxxxxxxx" <dalekelly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 04:48:51 -0500
Bert wrote:
"Can you get an idea of how popular multichannel services are down
under? Do your relatives subscribe to any such service? Do they find it an
unnecessary expense"?
Of the four households, only one subscribes to FoxTel while the remainder
use OTA analog.
The following DTV set availability is based upon today's store visits:
The two large stores visited were Good Guys and Harvey Normans. Each had
a substantial inventory:
Many DTV receivers were available at each store, twelve models were HDTV
capable. Several were dual tuner large drive DVRs priced from $770 to $600
US. The lowest priced HDTV STB was $160 US.
The lowest price of the four SD STBs was $60 US. Outputs were
Vid/SVid/RGB while audio was L/R and Optical.
All sets, except two large 1080P plazma units, were displaying LOCAL OTA
STATIONs (Cricket, Golf and a game show) in wide screen SD, which looked
good and which is a major departure from US store policies. The time of day
was early afternoon and no HD was being broadcast.
The 1080P sets were fed by a Blue Ray demo disk. The salesman advised me
that, as yet, no other "software" is available for this format. One was a
65 inch Panasonic with a price of $12,307 U.S.!
Dale
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Craig Birkmaier craig@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:06:58 -0500
To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [opendtv] Re: Australia DTV
At 3:15 PM -0500 11/24/06, Albert Manfredi wrote:
>Can you get an idea of how popular multichannel services are down
>under? Do your relatives subscribe to any such service? Do they find
>it an unnecessary expense?
According to Astra and other sources:
http://www.astra.org.au/article.asp?section=2&option=1&content=1
As at Quarter 2 2006 1,728,800 homes out of a total of 7,313,000
homes were subscribing to subscription television. With a typical
subscription television home having an average of 3.12 residents, the
industry has a viewing potential of nearly 5 and a half million
Australians (ie 5,401,200 out of a total of 19,447,000 people). From
a household perspective this equates to 23.6% penetration and from a
people perspective this means a 27.8% penetration. Source: OzTAM
Establishment Survey Q2, 2006.
And From:
http://www.budde.com.au/Reports/Contents/Australia-Digital-TV-Market-Overvie
w-and-Statistics-133.html
Digital Free-to-Air (FTA) TV has been held up in a vicious cycle
since it was launched in 2001. Available digital content has been
nowhere near sufficient to help drive sales of digital receivers. By
mid 2006, penetration of digital TVs (digital receivers or digital
integrated TVs) stood at only 20% of Australian households, which
still classifies digital TV as a niche medium. However, sales of
digital TVs in Australian homes finally started to take hold in 2005
and the first half of 2006 and this trend will continue into 2007 as
prices for LCD and plasma TVs continue to drop to more affordable
prices. This report provides detailed statistics on a wide range of
areas including adoption rates of digital TV by type of device,
household penetration of digital media as well as consumer surveys on
digital TV adoption.
Looks like things have reached the tipping point down under. The
Digital TV share has incresed from 20% to 30% in one year, and it did
this with little more than digital versions of what is available via
the Analog FTA service.
Historically, the multichannel market in Australia has been limited,
as has been the case in most European nations. When DTV was
authorized, Foxtel et al lobbied successfully to prohibit
multicasting.In this respect Australia is not much different than the
U.S. - i.e. techno-politics has the upper hand over market-based
competition. One can only imagine what the DTV penetration would be
in Australia now, had multicasting been permitted.
Here is the beginning of an article on the subject...
AUSTRALIA: Digital TV's key question is one of multiple choice
Multichannelling ban would give monopoly to Foxtel, Seven argued
The Age
Friday, March 24, 2006
By Helen Westerman
Major media players successfully lobbied to keep in place a ban on
multichannelling of free-to-air television stations with claims that
lifting the ban would damage local production of news and drama,
documents newly released have revealed.
But that argument was dismissed by the Seven Network, which strongly
supported lifting the multichannelling ban by saying that it would
have no significant impact on existing free-to-air or pay television
services in Australia.
The Seven Network also argued that failure to permit multichannelling
would entrench Foxtel, which is jointly owned by PBL, Telstra and
News Limited, as a monopoly pay tv operator and compromise the
digital platform.
http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=41370
Hope this is what you were looking for Bert.
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts: