[opendtv] Re: Auction Hi-lights
- From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:39:05 -0400
At 12:12 PM -0400 3/24/08, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
I'd expect these winners, i.e. mostly AT&T and Verizon, to build out
something that is similar in cost, possibly more costly, than their
cellular networks. And for which they will extract monthly fees at least
as high as that as well. (Probabaly higher, since this was the biggest
auction ever.)
I strongly suspect that the first thing these companies will do is
move much of their traditional voice traffic into the 700 MHz
spectrum. These operators have two major problems today:
Capacity and reach.
Adding spectrum helps with the capacity crunch, but the propagation
characteristics of the 700 MHz spectrum allow for much better
service, especially inside buildings. I would expect to see more
voice in the 700MHz bands, freeing up the higher frequencies now used
for voice for the rapidly growing 3G data services.
There was an interesting Forbes story I read this morning about Best
Buy moving into the mobile handset sector in a major way.
http://www.forbes.com/2008/03/25/best-buy-mobile-tech-wire-cx_ew_0325best.html?partner=alerts
The bottom line is that the cellular services are spending small
fortune in support of their current business model, where they have
stores everywhere to sell devices and services. All of the major
carries have announced flat rate plans (about $99 per month) for
voice and limited data. Since a big chunk of the 700MHz spectrum
comes with the new rule of open device attachment, Best Buy is
betting that they can take a large chunk of the retail market as the
carriers close these expensive storefronts and let consumers pay the
full cost of the devices in return for the ability to connect them to
any network.
At the same time, however, Google is pushing full speed ahead on
opening up the white spaces for mobile data services. It is quite
likely that future products like handsets that support Android, and
Blackberries and iPhones will have the ability to use or to bypass
the telco services.
So, assuming you're talking about FOTA broadcast, how does that revenue
compare with ad-supported TV? I don't know, but to me that's the
question to answer.
Or, if you're talking about ad-supplemented subscription TV, then maybe
the monthly fees can be a little lower.
The old models don't apply here. The mobile market is not moving
toward subscription service - it is moving away from these services.
Mobile consumers are going to look for services, not channels.
Services that provide exactly what they need, that take advantage of
24/7 connectivity to push the service to the mobile handset for on
demand usage. The notion of tuning into a broadcast while riding the
bus or train during a commute is as archaic as channel surfing is
becoming in the family room. On the other hand, the commuter may be
watching/listening to/reading something that they really want that is
already in cache, and perhaps searching for additional related
content or news.
The reason that "broadcast spectrum" is becoming relatively cheap is
that the push business model is growing relatively obsolete.
Advertisers are looking for prospects, not audiences. The ability to
reach real prospects who are pulling in the services they want has
much higher value that pushing TV programs to demographic groups.
THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE using broadcast techniques to deliver the bits
to the new "groups" that "subscribe" to a specific service. For
example, a radio or TV station might be well advised to create a
local traffic service that could be pushed to commuters...
I don't know about you, but to me these outrageous auction revenues are
scary. As scary as the way house prices went up the last few years.
Hrdly something to cheer about. The money might be going in the Treasury
in the short term, but somehow AT&T and Verizon are planning on making
back many times that amount.
Indirect taxation.
This is just a reflection of opportunity costs relative to the
actions of an entrenched industry that has been trying to change the
slope of the end of the product life cycle curve, by preventing the
best economic use of this spectrum.
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Auction Hi-lights
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Auction Hi-lights
- » [opendtv] Re: Auction Hi-lights
- » [opendtv] Re: Auction Hi-lights
- » [opendtv] Re: Auction Hi-lights
- » [opendtv] Re: Auction Hi-lights
- » [opendtv] Re: Auction Hi-lights
- » [opendtv] Re: Auction Hi-lights
I'd expect these winners, i.e. mostly AT&T and Verizon, to build out something that is similar in cost, possibly more costly, than their cellular networks. And for which they will extract monthly fees at least as high as that as well. (Probabaly higher, since this was the biggest auction ever.)
So, assuming you're talking about FOTA broadcast, how does that revenue compare with ad-supported TV? I don't know, but to me that's the question to answer. Or, if you're talking about ad-supplemented subscription TV, then maybe the monthly fees can be a little lower.
I don't know about you, but to me these outrageous auction revenues are scary. As scary as the way house prices went up the last few years. Hrdly something to cheer about. The money might be going in the Treasury in the short term, but somehow AT&T and Verizon are planning on making back many times that amount.
- [opendtv] Re: Auction Hi-lights
- From: Manfredi, Albert E