[opendtv] Re: Analysis: TV buying gets fuzzy as FCC and industry join to take viewers into the digital age
- From: Mark Aitken <maitken@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:49:28 -0400
This is EXACTLY what happened to a friend 3 weeks ago. He left without
buying the 32" (analog) set he wanted because of FUD. He then called me,
and I tried to set him straight, but he had already left the store. He
was replacing a ~21" (17 year old) set that died. He is NOT a big TV
watcher, and did not wish to plow a whole bunch in (he had a budget, and
the digital products vs. the size he wanted were way out of line).
We (as in he and I) went back to the BB store the following weekend,
bought the 32" set he wanted AND a low-end HT (w/ DVD)system that gave
him all (more) than he wanted, and his wife was THRILLED with the
'stunning' video quality and the 'terrific' surround sound environment.
all for <$500.
I believe that these store sales folk are trained to extract sales based
on FUD, pure and simple. I'd like to see a "grass roots" war waged on
them with the same ferocity as SBG was attacked for trying to exercise
its rights most recently...but then again I guess there is no law
against lying that anyone wants to enforce...
Craig Birkmaier wrote:
>http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2004/10/24/will_they_get_the_p=
>icture?mode=3DPF
>
>Will they get the picture?
>
>TV buying gets fuzzy as FCC and industry join to=20
>take viewers into the digital age
>
>By Bruce Mohl, Globe Staff | October 24, 2004
>
>Richard Kiley of Boston isn't a Luddite, but he=20
>felt like one after a recent visit to his local=20
>Best Buy store.
>
>Kiley went into the store to purchase a new TV,=20
>expecting to pay about $200 for a standard analog=20
>television set. But his salesman pressured him to=20
>upgrade to a digital TV costing nearly four times=20
>as much.
>
>"He tried every tactic he could think of," Kiley=20
>said of the salesman. The superior sound and=20
>picture quality were the first selling points.=20
>When that didn't work, the salesman told him a=20
>government-mandated transition to digital TV=20
>would render the cheaper set useless in two years.
>
>"He was adamant that it would be absolutely no=20
>good," said Kiley, who walked out of the store in=20
>a huff, wondering whether there really was some=20
>government mandate forcing him to buy an=20
>expensive TV set he didn't want.
>
>No such mandate exists right now, but pressure is=20
>building. Just as the Best Buy salesman steered=20
>Kiley toward a digital TV, so, too, is the=20
>government urging all consumers to go digital as=20
>part of a wholesale shift to the new broadcast=20
>technology.
>
>The Federal Communications Commission, partnering=20
>with TV manufacturers and retailers, recently=20
>launched a educational campaign called "DTV --=20
>Get It!" The federal agency is also requiring TV=20
>manufacturers to include digital tuners in more=20
>and more of the TVs they sell.
>
>The ultimate pressure is the looming deadline for=20
>digital TV conversion, a drop-dead date when=20
>broadcasters will be required to turn off their=20
>analog broadcasts and transmit digital signals=20
>exclusively. At that time -- the current target=20
>date is the end of 2006, but it's likely to be=20
>pushed back to 2008 or 2009 -- consumers with=20
>analog TVs will lose their service unless they=20
>buy a digital TV or a converter box that would=20
>allow them to continue using their existing set.
>
>"It could be the greatest government-mandated=20
>consumer expenditure of all time," said Bruce=20
>Leichtman, president and principal analyst at the=20
>Leichtman Research Group in Durham, N.H.
>
>Cable and satellite companies should be able to=20
>shield most of their subscribers from this=20
>wrenching change, offering set-top boxes that=20
>will keep the shows coming no matter what kind of=20
>TV the customer has. But the estimated 17 million=20
>households who get their TV free over the air=20
>could lose service. These consumers, dubbed the=20
>"last grannies" by some Washington insiders, are=20
>at the center of a debate over how to complete=20
>the transition to digital TV as quickly as=20
>possible.
>
>Many in Congress and at the FCC believe digital=20
>conversion will never happen until the last=20
>grannies are guaranteed uninterrupted service.=20
>Some officials favor government subsidies or tax=20
>credits of as much as $1 billion to help the=20
>holdouts pay for digital-to-analog converter=20
>boxes, which are expected to cost $50 to $100.=20
>Some officials say the analog users should even=20
>be allowed to use the subsidies to buy digital=20
>TVs or cable and satellite subscriptions.
>
>The whole process is incredibly confusing, and it=20
>gets worse when you head into an electronics=20
>store to look for a TV. Not only is there a=20
>bewildering array of product choices, but=20
>salespeople are not always up on the latest=20
>twists and turns in Congress, and they often end=20
>up giving misleading information.
>
>Lee Simonson, TV business team director at=20
>Richfield, Minn.-based Best Buy, said he "was=20
>disappointed" that Kiley's salesperson gave him=20
>misleading information. He said that salespeople=20
>are given training on products as well as the=20
>regulatory climate. "It's very confusing and not=20
>definitive," Simonson said of the regulatory=20
>climate.
>
>Digital TV offers consumers richer sound and=20
>crisper pictures. The ultimate digital format is=20
>high definition, which offers more than twice as=20
>much picture detail as an analog television.
>
>Digital TV also offers broadcasters more=20
>flexibility. In the same bandwidth it takes to=20
>transmit one analog channel, digital compression=20
>allows a broadcaster to deliver six standard=20
>definition programs simultaneously or one=20
>high-definition channel. The digital technology=20
>also allows broadcasters to deliver data along=20
>with a picture and even give it computer-like=20
>functions that allow customers, for example, to=20
>buy something they see on their screens or find=20
>out more information.
>
>Leichtman, the research analyst, advises=20
>consumers who want to spend about $300 on a TV to=20
>ignore the looming digital TV deadline and buy an=20
>analog set. But if a consumer is interested in=20
>spending more, Leichtman says, he should consider=20
>upgrading to a high-definition digital TV. A=20
>32-inch high-definition TV typically costs around=20
>$1,000.
>
>Despite its high price tag, consumers have=20
>embraced digital TV technology fairly rapidly.=20
>Digital TV sales are expected to jump nearly 59=20
>percent this year to 7 million sets. The Consumer=20
>Electronics Association estimates 11 percent of=20
>US households now have a digital TV.
>
>But the government wants the transition to=20
>digital TV to go faster. Right now most TV=20
>stations are broadcasting programs in both analog=20
>and digital formats, but the government is eager=20
>to reclaim the analog spectrum. It wants to use=20
>part of the spectrum for public safety purposes=20
>and auction off the rest to companies interested=20
>in wireless broadband applications. The spectrum=20
>is considered so valuable that the auction could=20
>net $30 billion to $40 billion.
>
>Congress originally selected Dec. 31, 2006, as=20
>the date when analog broadcasts would be=20
>terminated, but widespread acceptance of digital=20
>television is unlikely by then. The FCC favors=20
>pushing back the date until 2009, while a bill=20
>nearing final passage in Congress would terminate=20
>some analog broadcasts in 2008 and recover the=20
>vacated spectrum for public safety uses.
>
>In the meantime, the FCC is teaming up with TV=20
>manufacturers and retailers to educate consumers=20
>about digital TV, a collaboration that concerns=20
>some academics and authors.
>
>"I don't see a social purpose here. I see an=20
>increase in what consumers have to pay," said=20
>Juliet B. Schor, a professor of sociology at=20
>Boston College.
>
>Susan Linn, an instructor in psychiatry at=20
>Harvard Medical School and the author of=20
>"Consuming Kids: The Hostile Takeover of=20
>Childhood," said she worries about the=20
>interactive nature of digital TV and its=20
>potential to make television an even more=20
>powerful marketing tool.
>
>"We sort of fall in love with technology and we=20
>don't think about the ethical or social issues=20
>involved," she said. "This is going to be a gold=20
>mine for marketers."
>
>Rebecca Fisher, a spokeswoman for the FCC, said=20
>the agency is not promoting an industry or urging=20
>consumers to buy more expensive TVs. She said the=20
>agency is merely attempting to explain a mandated=20
>directive from Congress.
>
>"The true disservice would be for the FCC to=20
>ignore the effect the transition will have on=20
>consumers and let TVs turn dark on the day of the=20
>transition," she said.
>
>Bruce Mohl can be reached at mohl@xxxxxxxxxx
> =A9 Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>FreeLists.org
>
>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Mark A. Aitken Director, Advanced Technology
***********************************
Sinclair Broadcast Group
10706 Beaver Dam Road
Hunt Valley, MD 21030
Business TEL: (410) 568-1535
Business MOBILE: (443) 677-4425
Business FAX: (410) 568-1580
E-mail: maitken@xxxxxxxxxx
Text PAGE: page.maitken@xxxxxxxxxx
www.newscentral.tv
www.sbgi.net
===================================
“There never was a good war
or bad peace....”
~ ~ ~ Benjamin Franklin ~ ~ ~
***********************************
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This email message and any files transmitted with it contain
confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom this
email message is addressed. If you have received this email message in
error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email and
destroy the original message without making a copy. Thank you.
***********************************
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts: