Craig Birkmaier wrote: >> Sorry, Craig, but this is, and has been, your own narrative, not >> necessarily related to reality at all. We very simply disagree. > > No Bert, it is a simple fact that can easily be verified. But the "verification" talks about other matters. Notebook computers outsell desktops in 2003? So? "Your narrative" has been that people bought HDTVs in order to watch SD content, like DVDs, not in order to watch HD content. But neither of those two sources made that point. Your second source, Wikipedia, simply repeats what I just said. Which is that HDTV sales took off only around 2006 or so, when prices started falling below $1000, and when LCDs took over from plasma displays, for sizes up to 42" (and eventually bigger.) > You are correct that LCDs were featured in some consumer > electronics products in the '90s ... Actually in the 1980s. Maybe early 1980s. They were featured in tiny hand-held TV sets, perhaps 2" screens or so. More of a curiosity than anything else, but it did make me long for the days when TVs would become LCDs. I first saw them, I think it was, at The Sharper Image stores. Really cool stuff, but only because of what they promised for the future. > Please not that at this time only a handful of TV stations were > broadcasting in HD, and there were no other HD programming sources. Craig, TV stations started transmitting HD prime time programming in November 1998, in all of the major markets. The sales of HDTVs started then, not before then. And they really took off after 2005-2006 or so, thanks to lower prices. OTA TV HD receivers were sought after by early adopters, simply because cable and satellite had dragged their feet. All of this is consistent. By 2006, OTA, cable, and DBS were all transmitting HD content. Even daytime soap operas were HD by then. So of course people bought HDTVs. > Yet HDTV sales were starting to grow. Also note that LCD TVs did > not outsell analog CRT TVs until the Christmas season of 2007. Which exactly makes my point. Let's not forget, Craig, that you were the nay-sayer still, well into the 2000s, about HDTV sales, not me. I was the one trying to explain how this market was evolving. You can tell, it really bugs me to hear you changing your story, when the evolution happened exactly as I was saying then. >> Super VHS can provide a luminance bandwidth of 5.4 MHz, which is >> very, very close to what DVD players provide, and is quite a bit >> better than 4.2 MHz of OTA NTSC (in 6 MHz channels). DVD players >> provide about 5.6 MHz luminance bandwidth. So, very similar. > > NOT SIMILAR AT ALL. You don't think that a baseband bandwidth of 5.4 MHz is similar to 5.6 MHz? And a lot better than 4.2 MHz? Astonishing. Your point about the color info is true, but tangential. Image sharpness comes primarily from the luminance (and yes, perceived sharpness also follows from high contrast color). But, for instance, DTV's 4:2:0 method results in unquestionably better sharpness than OTA NTSC, right? You don't need 4:4:4 to see a huge improvement compared with analog OTA NTSC! Similarly, S-VHS did a whole lot better than analog OTA NTSC. You did not need DVDs to beat the pants off analog OTA NTSC. There were some pre-recorded S-VHS cassettes that were very, very impressive. >> The very first HDTV appeared on store shelves with the >> introduction of HDTV transmissions. > Patently untrue. I can go back in the list archives and find > numerous threads about the LACK of OTA HDTV content in stores > until well into the next decade. Once again: "The very first HDTVs appeared on store shelves with the introduction of HDTV transmissions." That sentence DOES NOT say in huge numbers, DOES NOT say at low prices, DOES NOT say they were LCDs. In 1998-1999 time frame is when *I went* to Best Buy and Circuit City stores and *I saw* the first HDTV sets for sale. There were 16:9 Sony CRT sets, for example, and also RCA CRTs. It may be true that in markets like Gainesville, where perhaps HD broadcasting had not yet started, you could not find HD sets for sale. I wouldn't be a bit surprised. Because HD content on TV *is* what generated HDTV sales. If anything, you again made my point. > There was one NFL game broadcast in HD in 1998 - only in New > York City Sorry Craig, but as I recall, most prime time programming was HDTV with the November 1998 introduction of OTA DTV, with the exception of Fox. They transmitted 480p for some time. I know this, because ABC and CBS were saying "available in HD," while our Fox affiliate used to convert the Fox picture directly to NTSC, letterboxed and all, with the banner saying something like "enhanced resolution," or whatever. Evidently, Fox didn't like this, because they quit letterboxing on analog. I even wrote this to the list, back then. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.