[opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Tom Barry <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:17:29 -0500
How about a 720p/60 MPEG-2 base layer for ATSC OTA and a 1080p/60 self
contained AVC non-ATSC version of it to give to cable companies who have
their own non-ATSC non-cable-card-compat boxes? The enhancement layer
would be reserved for press releases. ;-)
It would still give us a route to properly oversampled 720p on 1080p
screens.
- Tom
Ron Economos wrote:
The stuff on 1080p@60 caught my eye. A 1080i@30
base layer just seems wrong and already takes up the
entire channel. A 720p@60 base layer seems
much more appropriate. It would be ironic
if 1080p@60 drove the proliferation of
720p@60 for most ATSC viewers!
However, scalable encoding standards are not very
popular. Anyone ever seen any /real-time/ MPEG-2
Spatial@HL, SNR@HL or HP@HL decoders
or encoders? I haven't.
Plus, I would assume the enhancement layer is H.264.
That's a pretty different decoder (although not too
far fetched). The problem here is a chicken an egg
one. Without a decoder, the standard will not reach
critical mass.
Ron
Mark Schubin wrote:
http://tvnewsday.com/articles/2007/01/25/daily.5/
--
Tom Barry trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx
Find my resume and video filters at www.trbarry.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Craig Birkmaier
- References:
- [opendtv] ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Ron Economos
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
The stuff on 1080p@60 caught my eye. A 1080i@30 base layer just seems wrong and already takes up the entire channel. A 720p@60 base layer seems much more appropriate. It would be ironic if 1080p@60 drove the proliferation of 720p@60 for most ATSC viewers! However, scalable encoding standards are not very popular. Anyone ever seen any /real-time/ MPEG-2 Spatial@HL, SNR@HL or HP@HL decoders or encoders? I haven't. Plus, I would assume the enhancement layer is H.264. That's a pretty different decoder (although not too far fetched). The problem here is a chicken an egg one. Without a decoder, the standard will not reach critical mass. Ron Mark Schubin wrote:
http://tvnewsday.com/articles/2007/01/25/daily.5/
- [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Craig Birkmaier
- [opendtv] ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Ron Economos