[opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Ron Economos <k6mpg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:23:16 -0800
The stuff on 1080p@60 caught my eye. A 1080i@30
base layer just seems wrong and already takes up the
entire channel. A 720p@60 base layer seems
much more appropriate. It would be ironic
if 1080p@60 drove the proliferation of
720p@60 for most ATSC viewers!
However, scalable encoding standards are not very
popular. Anyone ever seen any /real-time/ MPEG-2
Spatial@HL, SNR@HL or HP@HL decoders
or encoders? I haven't.
Plus, I would assume the enhancement layer is H.264.
That's a pretty different decoder (although not too
far fetched). The problem here is a chicken an egg
one. Without a decoder, the standard will not reach
critical mass.
Ron
Mark Schubin wrote:
http://tvnewsday.com/articles/2007/01/25/daily.5/
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Tom Barry
- References:
- [opendtv] ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Mark Schubin
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- » [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
http://tvnewsday.com/articles/2007/01/25/daily.5/
- [opendtv] Re: ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Tom Barry
- [opendtv] ATSC 2.0, ATSC-H, ATSC-M
- From: Mark Schubin