[opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- From: "John Willkie" <JohnWillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:45:48 -0700
The evidence I offer is that an ATSC region was assigned to Taiwan. I am
told that only happens when a country signs an agreement with ATSC to be an
ATSC country. I can only assume -- since the region has not been deleted --
that Taiwan is still an ATSC signatory. Not that that prevents them from
adopting other technologies.
Tijuana has the following native tv stations
3 (Canal Once/XEIPN from Mexico City)
XETV 6 Fox
XEWT 12
21 TV Azteca
27 TV Azteca
33
45
49 (Tecate/Tijuana)
57
By the way, each of the above television stations will get a digital
channel, and Tijuana is in the first phase of Mexico's 18 year transition to
digital.
Not including Ensenada, or San Diego or Los Angeles TV stations.
I engaged in slight exaggeration. Korea has three tv channels; Britan has
5; France 6, Germany about seven. They're countries. Tijuana is a modest
city of 2.5 million. Britan alone has 58 million.
Ain't competition wonderful.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Schubin" <tvmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 1:50 PM
Subject: [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
> John Willkie wrote:
>
> >It's no coincidence, in my mind, that the two lilly-livered ATSC
> >countries -- South Korea and Taiwan -- have models that are identical to
> >that of Europe.
> >
> >
> What makes you think Taiwan is an ATSC country?
>
> "Taiwan terrestrial broadcasters started broadcasting digital programmes
> in July 2004 using the DVB-T transmission system. DVB-MHP was also
> adopted for its for its interactive services."
> http://www.dvb.org/index.php?id=235
>
> >There are more TV stations -- independent television signals -- offered
in
> >Tijuana, Mexico, from Mexican transmitters, than are offered in Britan,
> >France, Germany, Korea and Taiwan COMBINED.
> >
> >
> That's another one you'll have to explain to me.
>
> TTFN,
> Mark
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- From: Mark Schubin
- References:
- [opendtv] A detail in the history of video standards
- From: olho_avatar_i@xxxxxxxxxx
- [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- From: Mark Schubin
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- » [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- From: Mark Schubin
- [opendtv] A detail in the history of video standards
- From: olho_avatar_i@xxxxxxxxxx
- [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: A detail in the history of video standards
- From: Mark Schubin