Richard Hollandsworth wrote: > The biggest differences between current MPEG2 architecture > and IPTV is that the former is not very error/delay tolerant > and hence must be either streamed from a "local" server or a > dedicated "pipe" must be guaranteed from a remote server to > the user. IMO, the biggest difference is that IPTV allows very thin pipes to customer premises to make use of very fat backbones in the core service provider network. But let's look at real numbers, to see just what the user experience could be. With upgraded cable systems, which go up into the UHF band, and fully converted to 256-QAM, *without breaking a sweat*, the cable company can offer at least 250-300 or more simultaneous 60p sports HDTV programs. This is a no-brainer, requiring no fast routers in the backbone, using only MPEG-2 TS. And double this to 500+ if you use AVC/H.264. Or several thousand SDTV/EDTV programs, still without breaking a sweat. Or a mix of HD and SD, numbering in the many hundreds to a couple thousand choices, without any fancy core network equipment. All of this ending up in every household. If the cable company offers one or two channels, switched per household, for broadband Internet access, that would allow for any niche programming that the thousands of simultaneous channels available to that household don't provide. Clearly, this much choice to the subscriber, without the cable company getting any extra benefit compared with any existing scheme, is not going to be all that appealing to that company, even if subscribers might love it. That's why I don't buy into the generic IP hype. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.