[openbeostranslationkit] Re: go a head and send me the edited html (fwd)
- From: "Brian Matzon" <brian@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeostranslationkit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 19:38:46 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Wilber" <wilber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> This got sent to me, I don't know how they found me, but here this is.
heh - that should have been for Travis it seems :)
Seems a tad better that Travis' version ;P
As we're on the topic of beautification.
1. Our source code is really inconsistent. We need to beautify it.
- we need to use the same header - preferably something along
that of BTranslatorRosterTest.cpp which I got from some
plugin (can't remember where).
- we need to use doxygen tags (tutorial/faq anywhere?)
- we need to comment using opentracker guiding lines...
- Genereally I think we all break(coding guidelines) some
stuff here and there, but we really should aim for consistency.
2. The progress plan need to be consistent. Currently BBitmapStream
has all its methods marked as need testing while BTranslatorRoster
doesn't. Either we expand all of them or we don't. I vote for not
expanding them...
I realize that this is not particularly relevant right now, given that we have
other things to do. But at least now we've gotten it on the table..
/Brian Matzon
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeostranslationkit] Beautification Topics
- From: Travis Smith
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [openbeostranslationkit] Re: go a head and send me the edited html (fwd)
- » [openbeostranslationkit] Re: go a head and send me the edited html (fwd)
- [openbeostranslationkit] Beautification Topics
- From: Travis Smith