[openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:43:16 +0100 CET
"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > I don't think real sessions will ever actually overlap; I believe
> > they
> > just refer to data outside their own session using absolute disc
> > addresses.
> Sure, but a bad partition table may specify that too partitions span
> overlapping areas. That's what I mean. The partition module rejecting
> the session, as done now, is a very simple solution, but, if one
> doesn't do that, one has to decide, what to present to the user. Both
> partitions=3F One=3F None=3F
That's a good question. I would just iterate them in standard order and
throw away anything that overlaps. That should be almost clean.
In fact, I had this once, since the f&#=3Fing fdisk tool from Windows 98
created a partition in the middle of the hard disk that spanned over
two other partitions - fortunately, I didn't lost anything due to that,
and I could remove the partition without any problems later again.
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosstorage] session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- From: Ingo Weinhold