[openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:15:02 +0100 CET
Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> One thing I've noticed is that the CDROM table of contents currently
> is read two or three times (I forget which) for each effectively
> recognized session. It would probably be a lot faster if we could
> return a cookie after the first call to get=5Fnth=5Fsession(), or at
> least cut the number of calls down from the disk=5Fscanner to the
> session modules to once per session index. Is this multiple call
> behaviour expected=3F
I guess it is, but I would also like to have a better solution - the
cookie idea seems to be fine for me.
> So, my current task list now looks like this:
> + Join the multi-session volume set investigation
> + Have a closer look at Ingo's C++ Device API stuff
> + Add Joliet volume name support to iso9660 add-on
Very nice :)
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeosstorage] session module
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosstorage] session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- [openbeosstorage] session module
- From: Tyler Dauwalder