[openbeosstorage] Re: SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 00:04:19 +0200 (MET DST)
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Tyler Dauwalder wrote:
> Wheee. All nighters are fun :-)
:-)
> That's great. I suppose we ought to be able to #define
> USE_OPENBEOS_NAMESPACE now as well, correct? Cool.
The other day I read on the IK Team list, that in order to prepare the
move to the new directory structure/build system the OpenBeOS name space
shall be removed. Wait a second... there it is:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/interfacekit/04-2002/msg00007.html
Mmh???
CU, Ingo
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- References:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosstorage] SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- [openbeosstorage] Re: SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- [openbeosstorage] Re: SK_TEST_* and old BeBooks
- From: Tyler Dauwalder