[openbeosstorage] Re: Resources Progress
- From: Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 21:08:27 -0700
On 2002-05-06 at 13:10:38 [-0700], openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> though silent I was not lazy lately -- you may have noticed that I already
> spammed on the main list. ;-)
> I guess, I understood the resources format as well as possible for me and
> wrote down a documentation and a testing tool. It is certainly a good idea
> to check them in.
That was a well done bit of research. Nice work. Plus I've been meaning to
learn a little bit about TeX; now I don't have to go track down an example.
:-)
> Is just `docs/' fine for the documentation or shall I create a subdir? I
> mean, it's basically only one TeX file, but when compiling it, a whole
> bunch of files is created.
I think a subdir would be better. docs/res, docs/rsrc, docs/resources, or
whatever suits you.
> And the test tool? Into `test' or `tools'?
I would say tools/ or tools/restest. And since we don't really need
EntryRefToPath anymore, we could probably just get rid of it.
-Tyler
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: Resources Progress
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- References:
- [openbeosstorage] Resources Progress
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosstorage] Resources Progress
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Resources Progress
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Resources Progress
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Resources Progress
- [openbeosstorage] Re: Resources Progress
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeosstorage] Resources Progress
- From: Ingo Weinhold