[openbeosstorage] Re: Progress Update

> 
> Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So, it looks like I'm finally done with the cdrom modules, which 
> > leaves me with nothing to do (I even did some web page 
> > administrativa 
> > today, I must be out of work! :).

Oh, oh.

> > How far along are the changes 
> > you're working on, Ingo=3F

I have to admit that I was lazy last weekend. My little pet project, a 
read-only ReiserFS add-on, I started (and also planned to finish) over 
the holidays somehow began a life on its own.
Anyway, today and tomorrow I'll work on the Device API. I start 
reviewing the latest mails an rolling in the changes, now. I'll be back 
with a mail in a few hours, I think.

> > Unless you have any better suggestions, I 
> > guess I'll  start looking into what's still needed for the C++ API.

That's not a bad idea. I will do that too, but two pairs of eyes will 
lower the risk of oversights. When you start with it before me, then 
please drop a mail, that you do, and post a mail with the results, when 
you're done. Otherwise, I'll do that.

> Nice!
> Just a short question, now that I you've done all the hard work: will 
> the ISO-9660 fs module recognize the Joliet volume name as well=3F :-
> )
> 
> When the Devices API is done, we might think about doing a real GUI 
> partition module to see if the API provides enough possibilities for 
> what we want to achieve.

Yep, that's my plan too, but first we want to finish the C++ API of 
course, since that's the (only) one, that will deal with the GUI add-
ons, I suppose.

CU, Ingo

Other related posts: