[openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 04:53:20 +0200 CEST
Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2003-06-11 at 18:50:14 [-0700], Axel Dörfler wrote:
> > Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Sounds fine to me. `ps' would be okay by me, too, if `fs' is
> > > used.
> > The path is "file_systems" - and I really don't like cryptic
> > abbreviations like "ps" ("fs" could be an exception since it is
> > very
> > common), but it's okay to express yourself ;-P
> I just didn't want to end up with:
>
> (path)/fs
> (path)/partitioning_systems
>
> that's all. :-P :-)
Sure, and it's perfectly understandable, I just wanted to be mean ;-)
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosstorage] Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- From: Tyler Dauwalder