[openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 03:50:15 +0200 CEST
Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2003-06-11 at 13:48:13 [-0700], Ingo Weinhold wrote:
> > modules themselves, and those will probably stay in `file_systems'
> > (even if turned from add-ons into modules), we perhaps want the
> > modules for partitioning systems in `partitioning_systems'.
> Sounds fine to me. `ps' would be okay by me, too, if `fs' is used.
The path is "file_systems" - and I really don't like cryptic
abbreviations like "ps" ("fs" could be an exception since it is very
common), but it's okay to express yourself ;-P
Adios...
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- References:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosstorage] Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- [openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- From: Tyler Dauwalder