[openbeosstorage] Re: ISO9660/cdrom progress

"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > No, I haven't analyzed it at all - but my multi-session fs is 
> > really 
> > "simple" in that regard: it just always using absolute addressing.
> > That works fine as long as there are not do independent ISO-9660 
> > sessions on that disk, and I guess that's the case with it. Since I 
> > would need to be able to differentiate between a multi-session, and 
> > a 
> > single session, I was just too lazy to think about it, after 
> > scanning 
> > through the standard :-)
> > (as it works for almost every disk)
> I wonder, if that disk is perhaps indeed standard compliant. That 
> would 
> at least explain, why it fails when being accessed with (non-
> standard) 
> absolute addressing.

Yes, that's exactly what I think - I haven't doubted for a second that 
it's my fault :-)

> > Unfortunately, it even enters KDL with that CD, IIRC - so it's 
> > really 
> > something that should be fixed.
> I would be interested to have a look at it. Maybe you want to bring 
> it 
> to the next BeGeistert=3D3F!

Funny that you mention it, because I forgot to ask it in the last mail 
:)
I am looking forward to meet you there!

Adios...
   Axel.

Other related posts: