[openbeosstorage] Re: ISO9660/cdrom progress

Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > Looking at the root directory record, the location of the 
> > > directory's
> > > extent (an LBN) is always specified with an absolute block 
> > > number.
> > > One
> > > could debate that the sequence # of 1, which is also always
> > > specified,
> > > refers to the volume space of the first session, which begins at 
> > > zero
> > > (even for the first data session immediately following an audio
> > > session
> > > on an "Enhanced Audio CD", interestingly). And while that's true,
> > > addresses outside the first volume's volume space are still 
> > > specified
> > > this way. Further, every volume on the CD is always given the
> > > sequence
> > > # of 1.
> > 
> > Ouch!
> 
> The "production quality", pressed-not-burned CD that came with my 
> lovely new Pocket PC actually references a volume sequence # of 0 in 
> its addresses... 

You should claim your money back -- keeping the hardware, of course. ;-
)

[...]
> > > I, OTOH, have been approaching it as "There is no standard 
> > > followed
> > > by
> > > current burners (or Nero, at least; I guess others should be 
> > > checked
> > > too :-)
> > 
> > Oh, yes, please do that. :-) I can't, for I don't use Windows for
> > religious reasons. ;-)
> 
> Ah, I see how it is. :-) Well, might you be able to check any of the 
> burners available in Linux then=3F I don't have the patience to figure 
> out how to get something as terribly complex as CD burning software 
> to 
> work. :-P :-)

Actually, I've never burned a CD under Linux. In fact, the only CD 
burner I possess lives in a BeOS-only machine that has been terribly 
unstable for quite some time. :-(
Maybe I could try the Knoppix CD I got recently. I don't know whether 
there's a CD burner app on it that supports burning multisession 
ISO9660 CD, though. Oh, I've got a better idea, I could ask stippi to 
burn some CDs for me under FreeBSD. :-)

> Also, I recently inherited an iMac, so if I ever manage to get OS X 
> installed (ironically, Linux installed with only the expected handful 
> of hang-ups) and it turns out the thing has a CD-RW drive (I'm not 
> sure 
> if it does, and Linux isn't convinced yet that the drive even exists, 
> despite being installed off of it...), I'll check out some Mac 
> burners 
> too.

Cool. :-)
Hint for the Linux user: Try a newer distribution, or build your own 
kernel. ;-))

[...]
> > > Yes, though I see no evidence of any sort of restriction on where
> > > files
> > > can be referred from. It looks to me like any volume can refer to
> > > anywhere on the disc it pleases (not according to the standard, 
> > > but
> > > according to actual CDs and their root directory records).
> > 
> > Sadly. Maybe one should notify the application creators of these
> > standard deviations.
> 
> Yeah, I might do that. Maybe they'll counter with something along the 
> lines of "you're using an old standard, go look at XYZ". :-) I'm not 
> getting my hopes up, though.

If there indeed exists a newer standard, it would be nice to learn 
about it. :-P

> [rumblings of disk=5Fscanner interface and kernel migration changes]
> > > I, too, am thinking about this, but this reply has taken me long
> > > enough
> > > to get sent off already, so it can wait till next time.
> > 
> > :-)
> > No hurry. I haven't thought much about the matter yet. I first want 
> > to
> > get the userland GUI add-ons done, with partitioning support, 
> > before
> > actively reconsidering the registrar->kernel migration and the 
> > required
> > /useful changes.
> 
> How is the GUI add-on stuff going, btw=3F

It's progressing slowly. After some painful attempts to build a GUI 
with the plain Interface Kit, I decided to write some classes for a 
generic layout management. Don't worry, I don't intend to hold myself 
off too long with that. It will be relatively simple, and by accident I 
have this very powerful, `almost complete' layout library of mine 
discontinued some four years ago, from which I can borrow some ideas 
and code.

> I still haven't gotten around 
> to nosing around in what's been checked in. :-( 
> 
> As to the thinking...well, it's not quite done yet. :-)

:-)

CU, Ingo

Other related posts: