On 2002-12-17 at 09:53:38 [-0800], openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler ?= wrote: > > > Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > partscan (for partition scanner, better suggestions are welcome > > > > :-) > > > How about diskscan (more general, considering sessions)=3F Or > > > storage=5Fdevice=5Fscanner (descriptive, though long)=3F > > > > What about just disk=5Fscanner=3F Anyway, I like diskscan and > > storage=5Fdevice=5Fscanner both more than partscan :-) > > Damn, naming is always the hardest part -- coding is so much easier. > ;-) > If nobody minds, I will decide for one of the names before I check the > stuff in (solved my ssh problem). This won't probably be before Friday > night, though. If anyone feels like checking it in earlier, just go > ahead. I think I'll just leave the blame for the name to you this time. :) > > I haven't got any time right now, but I'll try to do some useful > > replies tomorrow! > > At least for me it's not that urgent. Tomorrow I will take a day off > for a > trip to the mountains and on Thursday I'll fly back to Germany, > arriving > at home Friday night. > > Tyler, if you have time and can't wait to do something ;-), I think, > it wouldn't be a bad idea to write a BFS and a CD session module, so > that we have at least one module of each kind for testing. In case we > change the module API, they won't be too hard to adjust. I have a skeleton BFS module working now, and will probably be able to finish it tomorrow. -Tyler