[openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 20:10:39 +0200 CEST
"Axel D=F6rfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > BDiskSystem::SupportsMoving() would return whether moving for the
> > partition is supported, regardless of whether it uses absolute or
> > relative addressing. The negotiation of the algorithm to be used
> > would
> > be left to the disk=3D3D5Fdevice=3D3D5Fmanager and the partition module
> > /FS
> > add-on
> > in question. I don't think the userland needs to know about the
> > internals.
>
> Dunno - if the disk had to be unmounted to be able to proceed, the
> userland app would probably want to know about it (and tell the
> user).
I would rather add a parameter `bool *requiresUnmounting' to
Supports{Moving,Resizing}(). Although, that parameter doesn't make much
sense for partitioning systems. But I think, I could live with that.
CU, Ingo
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- References:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosstorage] DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.1
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler