[openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:27:43 +0100 (MET)
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler ?= wrote:
> Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > Anyway, unless a final decision is made very soon, I think, I'll
> > start to
> > port the build system and the relevant parts of code to mwcc to be
> > able to
> > do some work on my PPC machine at least.
>
> Don't spend too much work on that; it's nothing wrong to let another
> compiler have a look over the code, but all those declspec stuff we
> don't need with ELF could give you a lot of headaches.
> But if you can do it on that code only... :-)
Argh! You're right. I bet noone even thought about adding at least an
_EXPORT in the right places (me neither, of course). I'm not even sure,
if our libopenbeos can be linked against libbe. *sigh*
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosstorage] DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API v2.0
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler