[openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 23:58:40 +0200 CEST
"Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > * uint8 BDiskDeviceJob::Progress() const;
> > I would love to see a float return value. I'd say, the most natural
> > range for it was [0, 1], but as BStatusBar's max value defaults to
> > 100,
> > I could live with that, too. The same goes for
> > B_DISK_DEVICE_JOB_SIMPLE_PROGRESS, of course.
>
> I would also prefer a float - we shouldn't let the BStatusBar's
> habits
> rule our world :-)
Oh, no, a misunderstanding: BStatusBar also uses float. It just
defaults to the range [0.0, 100.0], while I'd favor [0.0, 1.0]. Not a
big deal, though. :-)
> Furthermore, the disk jobs could tend to take a lot of time, making
> .x
> visible updates a plus or even necessary.
Sure.
CU, Ingo
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- References:
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosstorage] DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- » [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
- [openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.3 remarks
- From: Axel Dörfler