[openbeosnetteam] Re: stack
- From: "Philippe Houdoin" <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 09:09:16 +0200 (added by postmaster@wanadoo.fr)
Ingo wrote us:
> I commented out the inclusion of src/add-ons/kernel/drivers/net/
stack.
> Not only because it doesn't build, but also because the name `stack'
> for the net stack executable clashes with the STL header <stack>.
Woa, my bad: the executable name was supposed to be "net_stack_driver",
not simply "stack".
> This is a bit ugly, as it makes all files that include <stack> depend
on the
> net stack being built first. I see only two solutions for this
problem:
> 1) rename the executable (e.g. `net_stack') or add grist, e.g. `<net>
> stack', or even better `<user!net>stack' and `<kernel!net>stack' for
> the two flavors.
Hum, could you explain me, eternal Jam weebie, what's "grist"?
Will renaming the executable name would be enough to fix this issue?
Like this:
R5KernelAddon net_stack_driver : kernel drivers bin :
net_stack_driver.c // net_userstack_driver.c for Userland stack
version...
;
Bonus question: how to add support for building the kernel stack
version OR the userland stack version of this driver in this Jamfile?
Testing an env variable existence?
-Philippe
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
Overdrawn? But I still have checks left!
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: stack
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: stack
- From: Ingo Weinhold