[openbeosnetteam] Re: rtl8139 net drive
- From: "Philippe Houdoin" <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:14:10 GMT
Axel asked:
> "Philippe Houdoin" <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> [etc/protocols]
> > > Should the creation of this file be part of the Jam Install-
> > > Networking?
> > It should, yes.
> > I should check in first some sample config files into CVS first...
>
> Can't we better get rid of it?
For our current getprotobyname() (ISC's) implementation in libnet.so,
no.
In the future, yes, will be great.
I've in mind that each protocol module/layer could themselves export
a list of protocol name/alias and protocol number, which will remove
any needs to
this /etc/protocols file.
> Or move it to our own network settings
> structure before letting Jam create it?
For current implementation, yes, I guess I should do that.
When I can find enough time, I'll try to.
- Philippe
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
Spark's Sixth Rule for Managers:
If a subordinate asks you a pertinent question, look at him as
if he had lost his senses. When he looks down, paraphrase the question
back at him.
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: rtl8139 net drive
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: rtl8139 net drive
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: rtl8139 net drive
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: rtl8139 net drive
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: rtl8139 net drive
- From: Axel Dörfler