[openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:01:47 +0200 CEST
"Philippe Houdoin" <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > But disagreeing with Philippe, ifconfig is about creating/deleting
> > interfaces as well. At least it should be able to do so, even if
> > the
> > net_stack doesn't _need_ it for that. I am often using ifconfig to
> > do
> > that :)
> Oh, is it an official feature request? ;-)
> Because, currently, our ifconfig don't offer it.
>
> Obvioulsy, if we, one day, add creating/deleting interfaces to
> ifconfig, it make senses.
> But, tooday, it don't.
Oh, I thought it would already do that (since the original ones do this
as well).
It's also very handy when developing a network driver, since removing
the interface will unload the driver - and you can do a "ifconfig --del
/dev/...; rescan ...; ifconfig /dev/..." in the makefile automatically.
So in this case, yes it is a feature request :-)
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- From: Philippe Houdoin
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: new if_flag IFF_CONNECTED
- From: Philippe Houdoin