[openbeosnetteam] Re: libnetapi in libnet
- From: Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:34:43 +0200
Ingo Weinhold wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> is there a particular reason for libnetapi being included in libnet
> instead of being a separate library? An obvious disadvantage is, that
> ported (command line) applications and libraries that use the POSIX
> sockets API also have to load libbe. The overhead is probably not that
> dramatic, but, unless I miss something, totally unnecessary.
I would bet important parts of my body that it was only done to reduce
"clutter" in /system/lib... :-) But I don't know for sure.
Best regards,
-Stephan
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] libnetapi in libnet
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] libnetapi in libnet
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnetapi in libnet
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnetapi in libnet
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnetapi in libnet
- [openbeosnetteam] libnetapi in libnet
- From: Ingo Weinhold