[openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 01:35:24 +0200 CEST
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 01:05:21 GMT "Marcus Overhagen" <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Ingo wrote:
>
> > > /boot/home/config/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `_res' changed
> > > from
> > > 512 to 376 in /boot/develop/lib/x86/libnet.so
> >
> > Damn, I missed this. We apparently link against /boot/develop/lib/
> > x86/
> > libnet.so.
> >
> > Which is not surprising, considering:
> >
> > $ gcc -dumpspecs
> > [...]
> > *lib:
> > -lnet -lroot
> > [...]
> >
> > *sigh*
>
> Amazing. Patching gcc does *not* solve the problem.
>
> It reads this option from the "specs" file in /boot/develop/tools/
> gnupro/lib/gcc-lib/i586-beos/2.9-beos-991026
> Removing -lnet in the specs file will fix the linker problem,
> while the output of gcc -dumpspecs will remainthe same.
>
> > Anyone who knows, how to get around this?
> Yes
I have to admit, that I find Philippe's solution a bit better. :-)
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- From: Marcus Overhagen
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: libnet fix
- From: Marcus Overhagen