Nathan wrote: > > Yeah OK, I'll go in and fix the errors I guess. I mean why should > > everyone else suffer? > Hrrrm, I don't know? Why should everyone else suffer through any > bugs, > or badly written code? This is really not about badly written code; and removing the function call was just a stupid mistake. It's not exactly what I call good style to return the result of a void- returning function in a void-returning function, but at least, it should be valid. And commenting out other people's code that you didn't understand correctly in the first place doesn't seem to me as a good idea - that's why you should've asked, and that's what David asked for - no need to shout. Adios... Axel.