> Nathan wrote:
> > > Yeah OK, I'll go in and fix the errors I guess. I mean why should
> > > everyone else suffer?
> > Hrrrm, I don't know? Why should everyone else suffer through any
> > bugs,
> > or badly written code?
>
> This is really not about badly written code; and removing the
> function
> call was just a stupid mistake.
> It's not exactly what I call good style to return the result of a
> void-
> returning function in a void-returning function, but at least, it
> should be valid.
> And commenting out other people's code that you didn't understand
> correctly in the first place doesn't seem to me as a good idea -
> that's
> why you should've asked, and that's what David asked for - no need to
> shout.
Indeed, it was a stupid mistake, but I resented being flamed for it.
Apologies for shouting.
-Nathan
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
A.A.A.A.A.:
An organization for drunks who drive