[openbeosnetteam] Re: Thoughts about domains/families and so on...
- From: "David Reid" <dreid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:26:47 -0000
> > This gets us a UDP socket. Question is when we call socket we don't
> > specify
> > the exact protocol, which is what we've been keying off so far. So,
> > are
> > people happy that we add a couple more fields to the net_module
> > structure
> > that we use to store the extra details?
> >
> > Specifically,
> >
> > pr_type = SOCK_[STREAM|DGRAM|RAW]
> > pr_protocol = IPPROTO_[UDP|TCP|RAW|ICMP|IGMP] | 0 (IP)
> >
> > Then we need a function that will find the module that deals with a
> > particular combination...but that can just walk a list so I'm not
> > worried
> > about that.
> >
> > Anyone any thougts? I ask as this is needed for the sockets stuff :)
>
> AFAICT it looks fine to me - if it won't be enough in the future, we
> could always change that part (though I can't see right now why we
> should).
> Actually, I think it's a good idea that a module knows something about
> its role.
Glad you said that as I added it this morning :)
david
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Thoughts about domains/families and so on...
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] Thoughts about domains/families and so on...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Thoughts about domains/families and so on...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Thoughts about domains/families and so on...
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Thoughts about domains/families and so on...
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler