[openbeosnetteam] Re: Test apps (was Re: Re: KDL visits...)
- From: "David Reid" <dreid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 18:07:16 +0100
Yep, but we also need to stress it by throughput, and that means doing more
than just sending little packets to make sure we're not blowing up.
david
----- Original Message -----
From: <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx>
To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Re: Test apps (was Re: Re: KDL visits...)
> David Reid wrote:
> > I'm guessing therefore that we need more test apps and a way of
> > stressing
> > the server. Hopefully it'll show up the problems :)
>
> Maybe existing ones could be easy to port, too.
>
> Rain (http://www.tenebrous.com/rain/) mostly require SOCK_RAW support,
> which we have :-)
>
> Another one, but much larger/harder to port could be hping:
> http://www.hping.org/
>
> -Philippe
>
>
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: KDL visits...
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
- [openbeosnetteam] Test apps (was Re: Re: KDL visits...)
- From: David Reid
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Test apps (was Re: Re: KDL visits...)
- From: philippe . houdoin
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] Test apps (was Re: Re: KDL visits...)
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Test apps (was Re: Re: KDL visits...)
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Test apps (was Re: Re: KDL visits...)
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: KDL visits...
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
- [openbeosnetteam] Test apps (was Re: Re: KDL visits...)
- From: David Reid
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Test apps (was Re: Re: KDL visits...)
- From: philippe . houdoin